CFS Density Separator vs. Classifying Tanks
Superior technology is reflected in the many benefits of the CFS Density Separator. This is just a short list of advantages our product has over traditional sand classifying tanks.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
CFS Density Separator |
 |
 |
 |
Classifying Tank |
 |
 |
 |
|
The "next generation" in technology, delivering superior performance. |
|
 |
|
Dated technology, offering poor classification capabilities. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Maximum yield to saleable products; minimum waste. |
|
 |
|
Lower yield and higher waste. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Low maintenance cost - cost per ton of production approaches zero. |
|
 |
|
More required maintenance means higher costs. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
F.M. control is simple -- cut point is easily changed from control room. |
|
 |
|
Less F.M. control. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Allows you to produce two or more sands at one time. |
|
 |
|
Makes only two products, plus waste stream. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Few moving parts. Generally only one. |
|
 |
|
Many moving parts and manually adjusted linkages. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Easily creates specialty sands: golf course, foundry, glass, frac, filter, blast grit. |
|
 |
|
No ability to make specialty sands without substantial losses. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Operates automatically without any personnel. |
|
 |
|
Needs to be programmed and continuously monitored. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Not sensitive to changes in feed gradation or feed rate, up to rated capacity. |
|
 |
|
Large swings in feed analysis require operational changes. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Very high production rates, with low water demand. |
|
 |
|
High water demand. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Compact footprint. |
|
 |
|
Large footprint - high static load. |
|
 |
 |